Comments on: Kelis Reply To PETA On Fur

By: Ben110

Ben110 — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:51:42 +0000

As always, these debates become a flashpoint for other issues and a place to voice unrelated opinions, pushing us all further apart and less likely to ever understand each others’ views. I don’t agree with Kelis’s standpoint on wearing fur and, as a result, she won’t be making any money out of me anymore. But why start slamming her hair, etc? Stick to the real issue.

By: Kelis MTV Video About Fur Hat And Where To Get Your Fake One

Kelis MTV Video About Fur Hat And Where To Get Your Fake One — Sat, 15 May 2010 17:27:08 +0000

[...] sounds off on her PETA feud about that famous fur hat in this MTV [...]

By: Kelis Ready For Round Two Fur Fight With PETA

Kelis Ready For Round Two Fur Fight With PETA — Fri, 07 May 2010 21:29:14 +0000

[...] fired up the fur activists months ago when she replied to PETA’s criticism for wearing a fur [...]

By: Lina

Lina — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:34:34 +0000

Mmmm…looks like the “kindly, compassionate, evolved, caring” animal-lovers are filled with venomous hatred, racism, and other base emotions towards humans whose perspective on life is not the same as theirs. Your kindly love for animals does not necessarily transfer to kindly love or even tolerance for members of your own species. In general, you are the folks who hope to create a kinder, gentler, more just world through their “educating” the public towards veganism??!!! Stop decieving yourselves, you immature, racist morons. Your beliefs, taboos (any animal product), and prophets (Peter Singer, as batsh** crazy as Newkirk, herself, and others) point to nothing more than another nutty religious cult seeking money from childish, clueless misanthropes whose mental development ceased at the age of eight! As you can guess, I have NO PROBLEM with people who wear fur, but I despise racists and rabid fur- haters both as wasted life.

By: Lina

Lina — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:19:34 +0000

Looks like the kind, “compassionate” animal lovers are filled with venomous for members of their own species who dare to wear fur.

By: alex

alex — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:25:42 +0000

i’m gonna have to wonder about all of the people crying racism here. kelis DOES wear weaves, it’s documented all over the internets. so maybe the author wasn’t assuming that all african-americans wear weaves, maybe he or she did a little bit of research and came up with a joke that while kinda stupid was hardly racist.

By: Macy

Macy — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:49:42 +0000

As an African-American vegan reading this made me very angry. I totally agree with the fact that it’s disgusting to wear animals and use them for fur and the fact that Kelis thinks that it’s ok is wrong, but the statement about weaves was racist and extremally offensive. Kelis doesn’t wear weaves and its disgusting that you apparently think that all African-American females do. I won’t be coming to this site anymore because it is racist, i have never heard those comments made about the white female celibrities that you find offensive for wearing fur or other unethical practices but just because she’s a black female you think this is ok. I think that your black readers deserve an apology because that statement was very uncalled for.

By: jean

jean — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:00:53 +0000

I’m all for the animal rights and saving them from our evil abuse etc. But Singer’s book “Animal Liberation” is so full of holes and bad thinking that he should be ashamed to call himself a philosopher (A famous one at that!) We should not be using it as a front for our cause. Once the animal torturers get their teeth into it they can rip it tpo shreds then say to us “I told you so”